Pages

Showing posts with label Radames Pera. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Radames Pera. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Tech - Bose Speakers

Bose-Ohs! Are those speakers just a bunch of hype?



By Radames Pera – INsite Tech Editor

Another bubble must burst and I have the dubious honor, or at least obligation, to be the pin bearer. Ever since I started my professional life designing and intalling home theaters and sound systems, 99.9% of the time anyone has ever asked my opinion on a particular product, the sentence always goes like this: “What do you think of Bose?” No joke. I can almost see the “buh” sound forming before they get to the end of the question. “Wow. Bose again?” I asked inside my head, before making the more polite reply in the form of another question, “Oh, do you own a Bose system?”


Answers are either A: Yes, or B: No. If A, then I insert my standard respectful response A1 - no need to ruffle any feathers at this stage of the game, they’ve already made their purchase and are living with it for better or worse: “Bose is a very respected name in audio,” says I, “you must be getting a lot of enjoyment out of it.” If B, then I carefully go to response B1: “Well, Bose is really over-rated, and over-priced. A lot of other brands are better, and cost less,” adding, “What Bose is best at is marketing – they’ve rested on their laurels for decades, particularly with speakers.”

At this point people who fibbed with either “A” or “B” get all red in the face and try to argue about the quality and reputation Bose has and blah, blah, blah. In those cases, I smile politely and don’t repeat my opinion. But if they act surprised and pleased to hear something different than what they were expecting, I’ll elaborate a little further, depending on their interest level.

Its not that Bose doesn’t know how to make really good speakers, it’s just that most of the stuff they sell is crap - “cubes” as they call them, with paper speaker elements that are too tiny to deliver good sound, augmented by awful sounding subwoofers. This is the bulk of their business. Yes, they were the first company to popularize the notion that little speakers could sound like big ones by conveniently leaving the large subwoofer box out of the slick magazine ads, creating the impression that all the sound comes from tiny speakers.

While somewhat of a novelty when first introduced about 20 years ago, many Bose buyers were a bit heartbroken when they realized that no sound at all would come from the tiny cubes unless they found a place to put the relatively large bass box/amp somewhere in the room. And, that all wires had to run to that bass box first, from each speaker, not from the head unit (aka “tuner”) as is normally the case. Only then could it even come close to sounding like it did in the store.

But even in the late ‘80s when Bose introduced this concept, there were several small speakers already sold by companies like Jamo, ADS, Polk, and a couple of others that sounded pretty amazing without a clunky subwoofer attached.

To be fair, Bose released their first commercially (and acoustically) successful product, the 901 speaker in the late ‘60s and have been refining the“reflective” speaker concept ever since. They do make a great sounding (though quite expensive) professional line of sound reinforcement products that many musicians use and travel with, but their home entertainment line is outperfomed by many other lesser-known companies at considerably lower prices.

Their official slogan is “Better Sound Through Research”, though a more appropriate one, at least in consumer electronic circles might be, “The Illusion That Smaller is Better”. After all, they did singlehandedly convince the public that you didn’t have to have big speakers to have “big sound” and did help usher in an era where the husband got to have his home theater and the wife got to get rid of the monolithic speakers he’d dragged through life since college. That’s a success story right there.


Dubbed the Acoustimass Speaker, it used the aforementioned cubes which could be mounted high up on a wall to deliver reasonable sound when properly coupled with the weak bass sub. Oddly, the sub also doubled as the system amp, and while this proprietary approach allowed the tuner-preamp-CD player to remain very small, it rendered the system incompatible with most other brands of gear, hampering its expandability. Bose’s huge success with this gave rise to a host of popular brands offering their own all-in-one entertainment systems, also known as “Home Theater In a Box” (or HTIB).

Concurrently, Bose marketed the hell out of another over-priced product, the Wave Radio, which used a series of tubes (not like the internets!) to enhance bass response in a small-ish package. Buyers who forked out the dough got an oversized clock radio with pretty decent sound for a Master Bedroom or Kitchen application. Your Grandma might prefer it to a readily available (and way better sounding) boom box perched on her nightstand, but to me it always felt like Bose was trying to fleece older folks with those obsequious Paul Harvey Talk-Radio ads.

Perhaps Bose’s best innovation came with the evolution of the Acoustimass system in the mid ‘90s. Once again, they figured out a way to cram a Dolby Digital system – which included a preamp, AM/FM tuner, and DVD player into a curvy little silver chassis. This system came with a quintuple array of cubes, another weak subwoofer (again doubling as the amplifier) and best of all, an industry first: a remote control that didn’t require pointing at the equipment.

To this day, with any other piece of home entertainment equipment (except Sony’s PS3 game sytem) you still have to point the remote directly at the gear you want to control. The Bose remote uses RF (radio frequency technology) allowing power, volume, preset and track controls without pointing - even from another room. But once again the downside is it’s a Bose-proprietary thing - only their equipment can be controlled. Why big name manufacturers haven’t all gone to this is a mystery to me.
Luckily, there are a few third-party remotes that do RF with more flexibility than Bose ever had (see my tech column in the April Issue of INsite.)

In the end, Bose has gotten by a long time with a couple of fancy tricks - they aren’t really purveyors of quality. If you’re in the market for an HTIB, give ‘em a listen, then compare them to the more reasonably priced competition…you’re sure to get more bang-for-the-buck with another brand.

--------------

Over the past 22 years, Radames has professionally designed and installed hundreds of fine home theaters and multi-room audio systems across America. Please address questions and comments to: rod@getitwired.com.

Monday, March 15, 2010

March 2010 Tech

Happy Zappin’ – (Part I of II)


by Radames Pera – Tech Editor

So you’ve got a TV, a DVD/Blu-ray player, a satellite/cable box, a surround sound receiver, and maybe a VCR or CD changer still hanging around – that means you’ve also got a motley crew of remote controls scattered about to run each one. Maybe you’ve gotten one of those felt-lined “remote corrals” in the middle of your coffee table ‘cause somewhere Momma taught you to put things back wherethey “live.” That’s all very nice, but you still have to reach for different remotes all the time – and how cool is that really?

Regardless, it’s never been fun exactly to turn the whole system on and off, particularly if you don’t happen to be “the techie” in the household. And when that person’s not around, there’s a high probability the system doesn’t get much use at all, right?

Well, this article is intended to help – both the techies and the technically-challenged among us.

Consolidating remotes, that is getting one remote to do the job of two or more would certainly simplify things a bit, wouldn’t it? How about one that works them all – wouldn’t that be awesome?!

What about a remote that can turn the whole system on and off with the push of a single button? “Is that even possible?” Yes, it is. “It probably costs a fortune.” Actually, it’s less than you might think. Ask yourself how important is real ease-of-use (enjoyment) and peace of mind (no tension around the remotes) to you? If you happen to be the technically-inclined one, think of how nice would it be to stop getting those phone calls every time someone at home wants to use the system.

Let’s start with “free” and go from there. “Free? Nothing’s free,” you say. Well, if you’re a Time-Warner customer, you might be one of many who don’t realize that your cable box came with a remote that can control basic functions on about five different AV components, even raise & lower the volume on the AV receiver! Though the techie in your life could easily program this remote, you can call Time-Warner’s customer service yourself, get a live person on the phone and have them walk you through the fairly simple process: pressing two buttons on the remote at the same then time and entering a 4-digit number… something you do every day already. Before making the call, be sure to have the brand names of each component written down first. Remember that you’ll only get the most basic controls over those components; you’ll still need to access the other remotes for more involved functions.

If doing away with remote wrangling completely is appealing to you, paying something to achieve that end starts to make sense, doesn’t it? (Particularly if the idea of turning everything on and off with one button gives you and your significant other tingles.) You’re both beginning to realize that the cable remote isn’t going to cut it…not by a long shot.

Let’s address the “power user” now – one who changes source inputs on the TV and AV receiver a lot, regularly switches between different surround modes, and occasionally fiddles with the black-level output on the DVD player – for them it’s a different game entirely: only a robust programmable remote will do. And for the person who lives with the “power user”, the right remote can empower you, too.

Line-of-sight (IR – infra-red) remotes can be divided into three categories:

“Dedicated” are the ones that came with the equipment. Some, like the TV remote for example, may have a few extra buttons on it to control a same-brand DVD player. Occasionally, a remote will come with one of the better AV receivers that can be programmed to control limited functions on other-brand devices – though they all do it rather awkwardly at best.

“Programmable” are ones you can buy at an electronics store for anywhere between $8 and $300. The cheaper ones will work like the cable remote, while some of the expensive ones require you to go online, register, and then go through a tedious series of questions before you hook up a USB cable between your computer and the remote to download your equipment configuration into it. When properly set up, these can work pretty well, and even do some trouble-shooting with you, but they’re limited to the way the remote designers think you should interact with your equipment, leaving little room for real customization – and it is only with such customization that a remote can truly serve your needs, rather than the manufacturer’s.

“Custom Programmable” – terms like “bees knees”, “badass”, and “why didn’t we do this in the first place?” come to mind. Unless you’re a talented enthusiast, you will need a professional AV expert to program this kind of remote – but the result will be so worth it. Remotes like these fall into the $175-and-up category, plus an hour or two of the programmer’s time. Think of your friends, relatives, or even the baby-sitter for a moment – imagine handing them a remote and saying, “Just push this button to turn everything on, and this one to turn it all off.” Then ask how much that convenience is worth.

So far, we’ve only looked at IR remotes that must be pointed at the equipment to do anything. But what if you don’t like seeing a hodgepodge of electronics in front of you all the time? Or if the system is in a nice cabinet but you hate that the door always has to be open to run it? There’s also the spectre of Carpal Tunnel from always angling your wrist just so each time to change a channel. Furthering the cause of health, décor and convenience are remotes that use radio frequency (RF, like your wireless phone) to talk to equipment that is completely out of sight! Only higher end remotes have this capability. And while the RF accessory adds about $100 to the equation, being able to look at the remote at eye level and not having to point it in any particular direction is pretty sweet, indeed.

So this has been the primer. In Part II next month, we’ll break it all down into a few specific brands and models, the pros and cons of each, and home in on the remote that’s exactly right for you. Remember, happy zappin’ is the goal here!

--------------

Over the past 22 years, Radames has professionally designed and installed hundreds of fine home theaters and multi-room audio systems across America. Please address questions and comments to: rod@getitwired.com.